▶Now Playing, the videos worth your time, hand-pickedWatch →
Land.·Parcel Viability Tool
WORKING DOC WHOLETECH NETWORK
⚡ Built Agents Firstwhy →|AGENTS.mdllms.txtopenapiMCP
The case for the anchor parcel · 2026-05-12

№ 183Clover Road is the move.

Of the nine parcels on the OneHome search, only one is adjacent to an existing Walhus property, has Cedar Creek frontage, and already has a working tiny-cabin demo on it. The asking price is unrealistic, but the owner's basis is roughly $60K, which means there is real negotiating room. The other large parcels are pure dirt at five to ten times that basis.

Asking
$175K
↓ from $179K · 122 DOM
Owner basis
$60K
paid · per Paul
Realistic offer
$70–95K
comp-band + basis premium

№ 01 · Adjacency

Direct neighbor to 180 Ladybug Lane — Paul's home and rental complex. Same Leverence subdivision survey. Operational synergy from day one: shared management, shared eyes on the property, single drive between sites.

№ 02 · Cedar Creek frontage

Real creek frontage on Cedar Creek, the amenity the larger Hwy 304 and FM 535 parcels do not have. That's the kind of feature people pay rent premiums for and that anchors a community brand.

№ 03 · Water + septic, solvable

Currently on shared neighborhood well — a new well could be drilled to give the parcel its own capacity. Septic is a composting toilet today; an aerobic OSSF would be required for multi-occupant use. Both are known-cost, known-permit items in Bastrop.

№ 04 · Proven demo on site

A tiny cabin previously run as a successful Airbnb is already there. That's a working prototype of the Alpine Innovation Village concept on the exact land we'd build on, and immediate income to offset carry while the bigger play develops.

№ 00 · The Decision

Engage now, or wait while Bastrop tightens.

A decision for Anil Pattni · two outcomes, one clock
▶ Engage Now

Lock the anchor parcel in Q2 2026.

Make an offer in the $70–95K band against the owner's $60K basis. Close in 45 days. Keep the cabin running as Airbnb income while site-planning the larger village around the connected acreage.

  • Day-one Airbnb income (working cabin already there)
  • Adjacency to 180 Ladybug → shared ops, shared management
  • Creek frontage as the brand amenity
  • Aerobic septic + dedicated well are quoted-out, known costs
  • Establishes the JV on the ground while larger parcels are still being scored
First step: Anil approves a target offer ($70–95K), Paul calls Liana Walker on Wednesday, written counter back by the end of next week.
⊘ Wait

Sit on it. Re-look in 12–24 months.

Bastrop County continues to absorb Austin spillover. Inventory thins, basis prices climb, and the leverage we have today on a 122-DOM listing with a $60K-basis owner is structurally gone.

  • Bastrop median land $/ac up steadily 2023→2026 — trend continues
  • 122-day-on-market windows close as supply tightens
  • Owner-basis arbitrage disappears as parcels turn over to investors at full retail
  • Adjacency to 180 Ladybug only available once — neighbor parcels do not relist
  • By the time the village concept is "obviously right" the entry price has doubled
Cost of waiting: probable 2–3× entry price on the next adjacent parcel that comes up, if one comes up at all.
№ 00.5 · The Concept Network

Three sites, one thesis.

The village idea has been developed across three working concept sites · this is where they land
alpinevillage.wholetech.com

Alpine Village v1

13 modular container live-work units · Affordability Unlocked compliant · ~$1.92M total development cost. The industrial / cargo-architecture rendering of the village concept, proof of the unit math and the financial model.

What it contributes → the unit count, the dev-cost ceiling, and the compliance posture for the Bastrop build.
Visit Concept Site →
alpinevillage2.wholetech.com

Alpine Innovation Village

Affordable live-work homes and shared spaces for hardware hackers, makers, entrepreneurs, artists, digital nomads and freelancers. Live · Work · Create · Belong. The community + culture treatment of the same village.

What it contributes → the resident profile, the cultural pitch, and the "why people move here" narrative.
Visit Concept Site →
anilpattni.wholetech.com

Anil Pattni · Futurist

Sixteen years of hackathons, community experiences, and live-work development in Austin. Founder of Tiny Hacker House (since 2010). The track-record sheet that says this JV has the right operator on it.

What it contributes → the operator credibility, why this village gets built, not just sketched.
Visit Concept Site →
The supporting comparison · all nine OneHome parcels scored

And the other eight parcels?

For honest comparison: every parcel on the OneHome saved search, scored against the same twelve-criterion small-home-village rubric. This is how we know 183 Clover Road isn't the answer just because it's next door, it's the answer once you weight adjacency, creek frontage, owner basis, and existing-cabin income alongside acreage, septic, and zoning. The big dirt parcels are still in the working set as Phase-2 village sites.

9
Parcels in saved search
189ac
Total acreage available
7/9
With water access indicated
$4.2M
Combined ask · 8 priced
$22K
Median price per acre
№ 01 · The Brief

What we're actually building.

Use case shapes the rubric · use case shapes the verdict

We're not buying a ranch. We're buying a parcel that can hold a dozen small homes, a community building, a shared shop, a garden, and septic / water capacity for a multi-family use that has to last decades.

The rubric is tuned for things most listings don't tell you: zoning posture, county-level deed restrictions, soil percolation potential, distance to grid power, slope and floodplain exposure, road frontage, and the friendliness of the immediate neighborhood to a 10–20 unit cluster.

A parcel that scores 5/5 on view-from-the-porch can still score 1/5 on "can you legally put thirteen homes on it." We weight the legal and infrastructure criteria the hardest, those are the killshots.

№ 02 · The Rubric

Twelve criteria, weighted honestly.

Each parcel scored 1–5 per criterion · weights sum to 100
№ 01weight 15

Zoning & deed restrictions

The killshot. If the parcel sits inside a deed-restricted subdivision that caps homes-per-acre or bans rentals, the village is illegal before it starts. Bastrop County unincorporated is generally permissive; Travis County varies.

5 · unrestricted/ag · 3 · light HOA · 1 · strict subdivision deed

№ 02weight 12

Acreage & shape

Enough land for 10–20 small units + 30% buffer for septic, drives, common areas, setbacks. 5–25 ac, roughly rectangular is ideal. Below 4 ac you can't fit a real village.

5 · 8–20 ac, square-ish · 3 · 4–7 ac or odd shape · 1 · <3 ac or strip

№ 03weight 10

Septic & soil

Each home needs septic (or a shared aerobic system). Sandy-loam percolates; heavy clay or rock fails. Bastrop soils trend favorable. Look for prior perc results or existing OSSF.

5 · perc'd & approved · 3 · likely OK · 1 · failed perc

№ 04weight 10

Water source

Municipal water (Aqua TX, Aqua Water Supply) = best. Well = drilling + maintenance + multi-home capacity. Each parcel here has a "Water" flag in the listing, verify what that means (meter? line? well?) before offer.

5 · municipal tap · 3 · proven well · 1 · no water

№ 05weight 8

Electric grid access

Bluebonnet Electric covers most of Bastrop. Pole within 100 ft of build site = cheap; a half-mile run = $20K+.

5 · pole on parcel · 3 · within 200 ft · 1 · long run

№ 06weight 8

Road access

Paved county frontage = drivable in any weather + emergency access + USPS pickup. Highway 304 frontage (parcels 3, 4, 5) = great access but road-noise tradeoff. FM 535 = paved.

5 · paved frontage · 3 · caliche easement · 1 · undefined

№ 07weight 8

Floodplain & drainage

FEMA Zone X = good. Zone A/AE = elevated builds + flood insurance. Walter Hoffman Rd and the Hwy 304 cluster need FEMA checks, they're near drainages.

5 · Zone X · 3 · partial · 1 · majority A

№ 08weight 7

Distance to Austin

Cedar Creek & Bastrop are 25–40 min SE of central Austin. Hwy 304 parcels are deeper into Bastrop County (40–50 min). FM 535 corridor is closest to ABIA.

5 · <30 min · 3 · 30–50 · 1 · >60

№ 09weight 6

Adjacent uses

Ranchland or low-density residential = good. Industrial, feedlot, quarry, planned highway widening = noise and falling resale. Check satellite view + Bastrop CAD.

5 · rural/residential · 3 · mixed · 1 · industrial

№ 10weight 6

Trees & topography

Heritage oaks add character but limit footprint. Steep slopes drive grading costs. Rolling parcels with mixed cover ideal.

5 · rolling, mixed · 3 · heavily wooded · 1 · steep / bare

№ 11weight 5

Price per acre

Bastrop unimproved comp band ~$15–35K/ac unimproved, $40–70K improved. Several listings here are 4–8× comp because they're <2 ac (small-lot premium); those aren't village-scale anyway.

5 · <comp · 3 · at comp · 1 · 30%+ over

№ 12weight 5

Permit posture

Bastrop unincorporated is permissive, septic permits via county OSSF + on-site sewage inspections. Cedar Creek 78617 ZIP straddles into Travis County (Del Valle area) — check ETJ.

5 · unincorp, no ETJ · 3 · some ETJ · 1 · in city limits

№ 03 · The Comparison

Nine parcels, scored.

Click any cell to override · scores recompute instantly · saves to your browser
Initial scores from listing data only, septic, perc, easement, deed all need agent verification.
Address / MLS # Acres Price City · County H₂O C1 Zon C2 Acre C3 Sept C4 H₂O C5 Elec C6 Road C7 Flood C8 ATX C9 Adj C10 Trees C11 $/ac C12 Perm Score Verdict
0
▶ GO · Score ≥ 4.0
  • —
0
◆ MAYBE · 3.0 – 3.9
  • —
0
✕ PASS · < 3.0
  • —
№ 04 · The Parcels in Detail

Nine cards, nine maps.

Click → Maps, Realtor, HAR, Bastrop CAD · photos via realtor / HAR by MLS#
Advertisement
land.wholetech.com.private investor working doc.noindex.part of the WholeTech network
◐ Theme