WholeTechPicks|
⚫ In memoriam — Joshua Baer, founder of Capital Factory (1975–2026). Read the tribute → Now Playing — the videos worth your time, hand-pickedWatch →
Land.·Parcel Viability Tool
WORKING DOC WHOLETECH NETWORK
⚡ Built Agents Firstwhy →|AGENTS.mdllms.txtopenapiMCP
The case for the anchor parcel · 2026-05-12

№ 183Clover Road is the move.

Of the nine parcels on the OneHome search, only one is adjacent to an existing Walhus property, has Cedar Creek frontage, and already has a working tiny-cabin demo on it. The asking price is unrealistic — but the owner's basis is roughly $60K, which means there is real negotiating room. The other large parcels are pure dirt at five to ten times that basis.

Asking
$175K
↓ from $179K · 122 DOM
Owner basis
$60K
paid · per Paul
Realistic offer
$70–95K
comp-band + basis premium

№ 01 · Adjacency

Direct neighbor to 180 Ladybug Lane — Paul's home and rental complex. Same Leverence subdivision survey. Operational synergy from day one: shared management, shared eyes on the property, single drive between sites.

№ 02 · Cedar Creek frontage

Real creek frontage on Cedar Creek — the amenity the larger Hwy 304 and FM 535 parcels do not have. That's the kind of feature people pay rent premiums for and that anchors a community brand.

№ 03 · Water + septic, solvable

Currently on shared neighborhood well — a new well could be drilled to give the parcel its own capacity. Septic is a composting toilet today; an aerobic OSSF would be required for multi-occupant use. Both are known-cost, known-permit items in Bastrop.

№ 04 · Proven demo on site

A tiny cabin previously run as a successful Airbnb is already there. That's a working prototype of the Alpine Innovation Village concept on the exact land we'd build on — and immediate income to offset carry while the bigger play develops.

№ 00 · The Decision

Engage now, or wait while Bastrop tightens.

A decision for Anil Pattni · two outcomes, one clock
▶ Engage Now

Lock the anchor parcel in Q2 2026.

Make an offer in the $70–95K band against the owner's $60K basis. Close in 45 days. Keep the cabin running as Airbnb income while site-planning the larger village around the connected acreage.

  • Day-one Airbnb income (working cabin already there)
  • Adjacency to 180 Ladybug → shared ops, shared management
  • Creek frontage as the brand amenity
  • Aerobic septic + dedicated well are quoted-out, known costs
  • Establishes the JV on the ground while larger parcels are still being scored
First step: Anil approves a target offer ($70–95K), Paul calls Liana Walker on Wednesday, written counter back by the end of next week.
⊘ Wait

Sit on it. Re-look in 12–24 months.

Bastrop County continues to absorb Austin spillover. Inventory thins, basis prices climb, and the leverage we have today on a 122-DOM listing with a $60K-basis owner is structurally gone.

  • Bastrop median land $/ac up steadily 2023→2026 — trend continues
  • 122-day-on-market windows close as supply tightens
  • Owner-basis arbitrage disappears as parcels turn over to investors at full retail
  • Adjacency to 180 Ladybug only available once — neighbor parcels do not relist
  • By the time the village concept is "obviously right" the entry price has doubled
Cost of waiting: probable 2–3× entry price on the next adjacent parcel that comes up — if one comes up at all.
№ 00.5 · The Concept Network

Three sites, one thesis.

The village idea has been developed across three working concept sites · this is where they land
alpinevillage.wholetech.com

Alpine Village v1

13 modular container live-work units · Affordability Unlocked compliant · ~$1.92M total development cost. The industrial / cargo-architecture rendering of the village concept — proof of the unit math and the financial model.

What it contributes → the unit count, the dev-cost ceiling, and the compliance posture for the Bastrop build.
Visit Concept Site →
alpinevillage2.wholetech.com

Alpine Innovation Village

Affordable live-work homes and shared spaces for hardware hackers, makers, entrepreneurs, artists, digital nomads and freelancers. Live · Work · Create · Belong. The community + culture treatment of the same village.

What it contributes → the resident profile, the cultural pitch, and the "why people move here" narrative.
Visit Concept Site →
anilpattni.wholetech.com

Anil Pattni · Futurist

Sixteen years of hackathons, community experiences, and live-work development in Austin. Founder of Tiny Hacker House (since 2010). The track-record sheet that says this JV has the right operator on it.

What it contributes → the operator credibility — why this village gets built, not just sketched.
Visit Concept Site →
The supporting comparison · all nine OneHome parcels scored

And the other eight parcels?

For honest comparison: every parcel on the OneHome saved search, scored against the same twelve-criterion small-home-village rubric. This is how we know 183 Clover Road isn't the answer just because it's next door — it's the answer once you weight adjacency, creek frontage, owner basis, and existing-cabin income alongside acreage, septic, and zoning. The big dirt parcels are still in the working set as Phase-2 village sites.

9
Parcels in saved search
189ac
Total acreage available
7/9
With water access indicated
$4.2M
Combined ask · 8 priced
$22K
Median price per acre
№ 01 · The Brief

What we're actually building.

Use case shapes the rubric · use case shapes the verdict

We're not buying a ranch. We're buying a parcel that can hold a dozen small homes, a community building, a shared shop, a garden, and septic / water capacity for a multi-family use that has to last decades.

The rubric is tuned for things most listings don't tell you: zoning posture, county-level deed restrictions, soil percolation potential, distance to grid power, slope and floodplain exposure, road frontage, and the friendliness of the immediate neighborhood to a 10–20 unit cluster.

A parcel that scores 5/5 on view-from-the-porch can still score 1/5 on "can you legally put thirteen homes on it." We weight the legal and infrastructure criteria the hardest — those are the killshots.

№ 02 · The Rubric

Twelve criteria, weighted honestly.

Each parcel scored 1–5 per criterion · weights sum to 100
№ 01weight 15

Zoning & deed restrictions

The killshot. If the parcel sits inside a deed-restricted subdivision that caps homes-per-acre or bans rentals, the village is illegal before it starts. Bastrop County unincorporated is generally permissive; Travis County varies.

5 · unrestricted/ag · 3 · light HOA · 1 · strict subdivision deed

№ 02weight 12

Acreage & shape

Enough land for 10–20 small units + 30% buffer for septic, drives, common areas, setbacks. 5–25 ac, roughly rectangular is ideal. Below 4 ac you can't fit a real village.

5 · 8–20 ac, square-ish · 3 · 4–7 ac or odd shape · 1 · <3 ac or strip

№ 03weight 10

Septic & soil

Each home needs septic (or a shared aerobic system). Sandy-loam percolates; heavy clay or rock fails. Bastrop soils trend favorable. Look for prior perc results or existing OSSF.

5 · perc'd & approved · 3 · likely OK · 1 · failed perc

№ 04weight 10

Water source

Municipal water (Aqua TX, Aqua Water Supply) = best. Well = drilling + maintenance + multi-home capacity. Each parcel here has a "Water" flag in the listing — verify what that means (meter? line? well?) before offer.

5 · municipal tap · 3 · proven well · 1 · no water

№ 05weight 8

Electric grid access

Bluebonnet Electric covers most of Bastrop. Pole within 100 ft of build site = cheap; a half-mile run = $20K+.

5 · pole on parcel · 3 · within 200 ft · 1 · long run

№ 06weight 8

Road access

Paved county frontage = drivable in any weather + emergency access + USPS pickup. Highway 304 frontage (parcels 3, 4, 5) = great access but road-noise tradeoff. FM 535 = paved.

5 · paved frontage · 3 · caliche easement · 1 · undefined

№ 07weight 8

Floodplain & drainage

FEMA Zone X = good. Zone A/AE = elevated builds + flood insurance. Walter Hoffman Rd and the Hwy 304 cluster need FEMA checks — they're near drainages.

5 · Zone X · 3 · partial · 1 · majority A

№ 08weight 7

Distance to Austin

Cedar Creek & Bastrop are 25–40 min SE of central Austin. Hwy 304 parcels are deeper into Bastrop County (40–50 min). FM 535 corridor is closest to ABIA.

5 · <30 min · 3 · 30–50 · 1 · >60

№ 09weight 6

Adjacent uses

Ranchland or low-density residential = good. Industrial, feedlot, quarry, planned highway widening = noise and falling resale. Check satellite view + Bastrop CAD.

5 · rural/residential · 3 · mixed · 1 · industrial

№ 10weight 6

Trees & topography

Heritage oaks add character but limit footprint. Steep slopes drive grading costs. Rolling parcels with mixed cover ideal.

5 · rolling, mixed · 3 · heavily wooded · 1 · steep / bare

№ 11weight 5

Price per acre

Bastrop unimproved comp band ~$15–35K/ac unimproved, $40–70K improved. Several listings here are 4–8× comp because they're <2 ac (small-lot premium); those aren't village-scale anyway.

5 · <comp · 3 · at comp · 1 · 30%+ over

№ 12weight 5

Permit posture

Bastrop unincorporated is permissive — septic permits via county OSSF + on-site sewage inspections. Cedar Creek 78617 ZIP straddles into Travis County (Del Valle area) — check ETJ.

5 · unincorp, no ETJ · 3 · some ETJ · 1 · in city limits

№ 03 · The Comparison

Nine parcels, scored.

Click any cell to override · scores recompute instantly · saves to your browser
Initial scores from listing data only — septic, perc, easement, deed all need agent verification.
Address / MLS # Acres Price City · County H₂O C1 Zon C2 Acre C3 Sept C4 H₂O C5 Elec C6 Road C7 Flood C8 ATX C9 Adj C10 Trees C11 $/ac C12 Perm Score Verdict
0
▶ GO · Score ≥ 4.0
0
◆ MAYBE · 3.0 – 3.9
0
✕ PASS · < 3.0
№ 04 · The Parcels in Detail

Nine cards, nine maps.

Click → Maps, Realtor, HAR, Bastrop CAD · photos via realtor / HAR by MLS#
land.wholetech.com.private investor working doc.noindex.part of the WholeTech network
◐ Theme